Project Results Framework Indicators

Global Environmental Objectives

PDO Statement

The project development objective (PDO) is to improve management of marine resources in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden in selected MPAs building on resources protection, incentive systems for communities and harmonization of the knowledge base on marine resources between PERSGA member countries.

Global Environmental Objective Indicators

Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline
Cumulative Target Values
YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 End Target
Frequency Data Source / Methodology Responsibility for Data Collection
Marine areas brought under biodiversity protection (ha) X Hectare(Ha) 0.00
0.00 0.00 100000.00 200000.00 200000.00
Annually Updated management plan. PERSGA
Direct project beneficiaries X Number 0
0 1000 2000 3000 3000
Annually Monitoring reports. PERSGA
Number of alternative livelihood projects realized by communities Number 0
0 1 2 3 4
Annually Project report PERSGA/NC
Availability of harmonized parameters and database for PERSGA member countries Yes/No No
No No No Yes Yes
Annually Project report; Populated Database PERSGA
Female beneficiaries X Percentage 0
30 30 30 30 30
Annually Project monitoring reports. PERSGA

 

Intermediate Results Indicators

Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline
Cumulative Target Values
YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 End Target
Frequency Data Source / Methodology Responsibility for Data Collection
Participants in consultation activities during project implementation (number) X Number 0.00
100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 400.00
Annually Project monitoring reports PERSGA
Participants in consultation activities during project implementation - female X Number 0.00
30.00 60.00 90.00 120.00 120.00
Annually Project monitoring reports PERSGA
Indicator 1.1: Number of MPA plans updated with community input and with assigned rights for user groups Number 0.00
0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00
Annually Updated MPA plans in two communities; Project annual report. PERSGA and NC local MPA authorities
Indicator 1.2: Number of stakeholders trained and participating in developing/updating MPA master plans with a rights based approach Number 0.00
50.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Bi-annually Monitoring reports. PERSGA and NCs of member countries with pilots
Indicator 1.3: Rights based management system established in two pilot MPA sites for community user groups Yes/No No
No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Annually Monitoring Report PERSGA and NCs of member countries with pilots
Indicator 1.4: Number of institutional MPA staff trained to work with local communities and in rights based approach Number 0.00
5.00 5.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Bi-annually Monitoring reports. PERSGA and NCs of member countries with pilots
Indicator 1.5: Number of participants from five PERSGA member countries in regional meetings/exchanges for MPA counterparts on community-based MMA management Number 0.00
0.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00
Annually Meeting records with list of participants. PERSGA
Indicator 1.6: Availability of documentation of lessons learned from regional meetings/exchanges for MPA counterparts (number, types, and dissemination sites) Yes/No No
No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Quarterly Brochures and records of dissemination events PERSGA
Indicator 1.7: Percentage of community members involved in MPA plan updating and management who are women Percentage 0.00
0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Annually Project report PERSGA/ NC
Indicator 2.1: Percentage of fishermen involved in fisheries monitoring, control and surveillance activities Percentage 0.00
0.00 20.00 50.00 60.00 70.00
Annually - Baseline reports on fisheries statistics developed at project start by lead specialists in the communities; - Monitoring reports. PERSGA/NC
Indicator 2.2: Spawning sites for grouper (i.e. nagil (Plectropomus sp.), snapper (Lutjanis spp.) and other commercially relevant species under protection with community compliance Yes/No No
No No Yes Yes Yes
Annually Project monitoring report PERSGA/ NC
Indicator 2.3: Percentage variance in groupers Percentage
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00
Bi-annually Baseline reports on fisheries statistics developed by the communities/ lead specialists; Monitoring reports by communities PERSGA/ NC
Indicator 2.4: Percentage variance in corals Percentage
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00
Bi-annually Baseline reports on fisheries statistics developed by the communities/ lead specialists; Monitoring reports by communities PERSGA/ NC
Indicator 2.5: Percentage of female beneficiaries of alternative livelihood projects Percentage
0.00 0.00 20.00 30.00 30.00
Annually Project report PERSGA/NC
Indicator 3.1: Number of PERSGA member country staff trained in common monitoring parameters and methods Number 0.00
0.00 0.00 40.00 40.00 40.00
Annually Project report; records of trainings PERSGA
Indicator 3.2: Number of member country routinely employing the monitoring methods developed by PERSGA Number 0.00
0.00 0.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Annually Project reporting PERSGA
Indicator 3.3: Number of regional exchanges on data collection and findings from new parameters Number
0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00
Annually Project reporting and proceedings of the meetings PERSGA
Indicator 3.4: Reporting on GEF IW indicators and participation in workshops Yes/No
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Annually and as required GEF IW records PERSGA
Indicator 4.1: Functionality of project management including FM, procurement and environmental and social impact monitoring Yes/No
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Annually FM reports timely; procurement documentation; EMPs for sub-projects; Annual reports PERSGA

 

Download the Monitoring and Evaluation Forms for the Project